drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee
  • Podcast

8 Oversights That Can Bring Your Operations to a Standstill

by Jon Seals | February 25, 2021 | | 0 comments

This post first appeared on the MHA Consulting blog.

By RICHARD LONG

Events in Texas this week drew attention to what could happen to companies that are unprepared for a lengthy power outage. But this is only one of many types of failure to plan that can cause devastating consequences for a business. In today’s post, we’ll look at eight common business continuity oversights that can bring your operations to a standstill.

Looking Beyond the Texas Power Outage

The power outage that swept across Texas this week has raised the awareness among business continuity professionals of the need to be prepared for long-term blackouts. This is all to the good. However, it would be a mistake to get hung up on the issue of a loss of electrical power to the exclusion of other threats.

The failure to prepare for a protracted power outage is one of many types of common business continuity oversights.

Chances are, the next big BC event will not be a power outage. Nor is it likely to be a global pandemic, our other recent high-profile event. It will probably be some equally startling occurrence—one that will seem unlikely before it happens and inevitable afterward.

In today’s post, I wanted to break down eight business continuity gaps or oversights that I’ve commonly observed out in the field. The failure to be prepared for a lengthy power outage is only one such oversight (actually, it’s only a subpart of one).

If your organization can avoid committing the eight oversights described below, it will be well prepared to ride the storm out no matter the form of the next event that comes along.

8 Common Business Continuity Oversights

The following is a list of eight common business continuity oversights. These are ways that many companies fail to prepare adequately for negative events. Failure to close these gaps can have serious and costly impacts on an organization’s ability to carry out its critical functions.

1. Lack of sufficient redundancy in core functioning, including electrical power, telephony, and IT functions.

This brings us back to the Texas power outage. However, power is only one aspect of core functioning where many organizations are insufficiently resilient. Weakness in these areas can be crippling. The problems with breakdowns in power and telephony are obvious; that of IT is worthy of special note. It’s during times of distress that IT systems are most likely to come under attack. To fend off these attacks, IT network, security, and other infrastructure must be sufficiently redundant in terms of protection, access, authentication, and security monitoring.

2. Lack of sufficiently robust and redundant email and collaboration technologies.

The pandemic has greatly enhanced most organizations’ capacity in this area. Nonetheless, conditions change. Organizations should regularly review the robustness of their arrangements regarding collaboration tools.

3. Not having the necessary dependencies in place to carry on critical business functions.

Planners need to understand what must be in place for their critical processes to run. These dependencies must be redundant or backed up by workarounds. Example: At one company, the ability to ship products might be considered a mission-critical business process. Suppose shipping at the company depends on the ability to print labels; if the company cannot print labels, it can’t ship. In this scenario, the company would be well-advised to develop redundancy or a workaround for its label-printing operation.

4. Not adequately vetting third-party vendors.

Third-party suppliers are often less than forthcoming about their level of preparedness, or lack thereof. When critical supplies are unavailable, production or services come to a halt. To avoid this happening, it’s important to vet suppliers and have backup plans in place. (See this post for more on vetting third-party vendors.)

5. Not having enough IT processing capability.

Many companies are insufficiently rigorous in their IT/DR testing. It is common for companies to target only a portion of their environment for testing, assuming that will be adequate for an actual event. This assumption is likely to be incorrect, particularly for an event that is prolonged. It is critical to have enough processing capability, especially for server storage and load balancing.

6. Not providing sufficient training for staff.

Many companies make rash assumptions regarding the ability of their staffs to manage an event without training. The failure of staff to respond optimally during an event can seriously delay a company’s recovery.

7. Not developing sufficient operational resiliency.

The most common events are not complete outages but the failure of individual applications or components. Operational resiliency refers to day-to-day availability needs. The IT/DR solution and the operational solutions should be considered separately but integrated as needed.

8. Lack of sufficient redundancy in connection with cloud-based SaaS solutions.

 Many companies put little effort into thinking about the resiliency of their SaaS solutions. The thinking is, “not my problem.” If such a solution goes down, it will be up to the SaaS provider to restore it. However, companies should think about their SaaS interdependencies. Suppose a company’s e-commerce engine is running on one SaaS solution and its dependent data on a second SaaS tool. What will happen if the second SaaS provider suffers an outage? Companies should analyze these webs in advance and develop redundancies or workarounds for mission-critical processes.

Closing the Gaps

Because of the recent power outage in Texas, many BC professionals have begun assessing whether their organizations are prepared for a long-term loss of electrical power. This is not a bad idea; however, the next event to strike your company is unlikely to be a power outage (or a global pandemic). It will probably be something that, until it happens, will seem unlikely or even preposterous.

Failure to prepare for a long-term power outage is one of many business continuity oversights that can bring an organization’s operations to a halt. By closing the gaps in preparedness described above, you can increase the chances that your organization will get through the next event in good shape, no matter what form it takes.

Further Reading on BC Oversights

For more information on common BC oversights and other hot topics in BC and IT/disaster recovery, check out these recent posts from MHA Consulting and BCMMETRICS:

  • Vulnerable Vendors: Supplier Weaknesses Put Your Organization at Risk
  • Conduct an IT Wellness Check: Make Sure Your Tech Systems Are Healthy
  • The Magnificent Seven: 7 Key BC Areas to Focus on in 2021
  • One-Two Punch: The Two Problems That Cause the Worst BCM Failures
  • You Still Need to Drill: IT/DR Testing Is as Important as Ever
  • The Great Inspection: Identifying Likely Future Common BCM Problems

Richard Long is one of MHA’s practice team leaders for Technology and Disaster Recovery related engagements. He has been responsible for the successful execution of MHA business continuity and disaster recovery engagements in industries such as Energy & Utilities, Government Services, Healthcare, Insurance, Risk Management, Travel & Entertainment, Consumer Products, and Education. Prior to joining MHA, Richard held Senior IT Director positions at PetSmart (NASDAQ: PETM) and Avnet, Inc. (NYSE: AVT) and has been a senior leader across all disciplines of IT. He has successfully led international and domestic disaster recovery, technology assessment, crisis management and risk mitigation engagements.

Related Content

  1. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Rating Your BC Skills: Little White Lies Can Create Ticking Time Bombs
  2. Disaster Recovery Journal
    RTO and RPO: Making It Simple
  3. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Getting the Most Out of Your BCM Consultant: Do’s and Don’ts

Recent Posts

Patero Introduces Automated Cryptography Discovery and Inventory Workshop to Uncover Cryptographic Risk

January 16, 2026

Insider Threats: Turning 2025 Intelligence into a 2026 Defense Strategy

January 16, 2026

Calabrio Launches Omni Agent Intelligence to Unify Quality and Performance Across Human and AI Agents

January 15, 2026

Keeper Security Strengthens Atlassian Williams F1 Team’s Cyber Defenses With KeeperPAM

January 15, 2026

Dispersive® Stealth Networking Expands Cloud Partner Execution with Google Cloud Partner Advantage

January 15, 2026

CIOSO Global, LLC Marks Strong First Year Democratizing Fortune 100-level Cybersecurity Expertise

January 15, 2026

Archives

  • January 2026 (37)
  • December 2025 (45)
  • November 2025 (58)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (91)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2025
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2026 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience. The winner will be announced on February 13. Join us for DRJ's 74th Conference!
    Enter Now