drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Fall 2026 Call for Presentations
    • DRJ Fall 2026
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Tracey Rice Memorial Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • 2026 Media Kit
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee

AppSec Reality Check: 76% of Security Professionals Lack the Production Insight Needed to Secure Modern Applications

by Jon Seals | February 18, 2026 | | 0 comments

New Research from Rein Security Finds Most Security Teams Struggle to Detect AI Agent Misuse in Production

NEW YORK and TEL AVIV, Israel – Rein Security, a trusted application security company for leading enterprises, today released “The Great AppSec Reality Check: What Security Pros Really Think of Their Existing Tools” Based on a survey of more than 300 CISOs and AppSec executives, the report reveals a fundamental context gap in modern AppSec tools. Despite heavy investments in AppSec, over three-quarters of security professionals still do not have the real-time production insight necessary to validate risk and understand how their code actually behaves in real-world environments. 

The Insight Gap: Security Without Production-Level Intelligence

According to the findings, the primary hurdle for modern security teams is no longer tool acquisition, but the persistent absence of real-time context. Most AppSec tools scan pre-production and monitor at the perimeter, but as applications continue to grow more distributed through microservices and AI-native components, these legacy scanning methods are failing to provide the runtime context needed for efficient security operations.

This gap cuts across the entire AppSec stack: 62% of respondents said they are blind to shadow or undocumented APIs; 73% of SCA users noted a lack of visibility into whether flagged vulnerabilities are actually exploitable in production; and 72% of SAST/DAST users said they are challenged by an overwhelming number of false positives. This gap extends to emerging environments, too, with teams struggling to correlate Model Context Protocol (MCP) actions with execution outcomes (46%) and reporting blind spots around prompt injection chains or tool-chaining abuse (48%) in AI-native apps. Without reliable, in-production data, teams waste resources on non-reachable vulnerabilities while undetected threats persist.

“AppSec teams are drowning in tools and effectively operating in a data and context vacuum, forced to chase theoretical vulnerabilities without clear evidence of how they behave in production environments,” said Matan Bar Efrat, CEO and co-founder at Rein Security. “This report highlights a breaking point in the industry: the majority of AppSec professionals want production-level context, a clear signal that our current reliance on static snapshots has created an unsustainable cycle of manual verification and operational noise.”

Why AppSec Struggles to Scale

The data confirms that while a gap in production-level insight exists at any size company, it becomes most visible at scale. As organizations grow, the volume of unvalidated alerts creates a bottleneck that traditional staffing and management models cannot overcome. Despite only 38% of small AppSec teams (1-10 members) that use SCA citing their biggest pain point is the inability to verify if vulnerabilities are exploitable in production, that figure jumps to 63% for mid-sized teams (11–50 members) and remains high at 58% for large teams (50 members or more).

Industry-Wide Willingness to Replace

Frustration with these visibility and scaling challenges is pushing the market toward a massive shift. Respondents expressed a high willingness to replace current AppSec tools or adopt new solutions if they would address their biggest pain points: 93% are ready to replace or purchase new AI-native application protection; 88% are willing to replace API security solutions; and 81% are willing to pivot to new MCP protection tools. There are also several dominant tools that at least half of respondents would be willing to replace, including RASP (55%), SCA (52%) and SAST/DAST (49%).

Other key findings include:

  • Although 13% of respondents use agent-based deployment, most (87%) overwhelmingly prefer agentless, package-based or simple CI/CD-based deployment;
  • For ASPM platform users, 68% struggle to prove posture and risk to leadership or auditors, 67% cite data gaps and missing telemetry that create blind spots, and 60% say issues are still ranked by theoretical severity instead of real exposure or exploitability; and
  • For 16% of respondents, their ultimate wish is to consolidate the AppSec toolchain into one platform.

For more information and to access the full report, download it here. 

Research Methodology 

Rein Security surveyed 303 CISOs and AppSec executives at U.S. companies with 1,500+ employees (all with dedicated AppSec teams) across banking (12.5%), insurance (12.5%), fintech/insurtech (25%), and SaaS software (50%). The report was conducted online by an independent research firm, Global Surveyz Research, in October 2025.

About Rein Security

Rein Security is an application security company delivering a novel, patent pending technology with real-time, in-production visibility and protection. Trusted by leading Fortune 500 companies, Rein Security enables security teams to uncover which API, SCA and AI risks actually matter by correlating every request, response, resource, API and line of code in production. Backed by Giliot Capital and co-headquartered in Tel Aviv and New York City, the company was founded in 2024. For more information, please visit www.reinsec.io. To book a demo: https://reinsec.io/book-a-demo

Related Content

  1. Ways to Enhance Strategic Influence of Security Professionals Within Organization
  2. Future-Proof Business Security: Strategies for Long-Term Resilience
    The Future of Business Protection
  3. Integration of Cybersecurity into Physical Security Realm

Recent Posts

DataBahn Deepens Partnership with Microsoft to Accelerate Deployment for Enterprises at Cloud Scale

March 11, 2026

Virtana Introduces a New Class of AI-Native, System-Aware Application Observability, Rendering Legacy APM Obsolete

March 10, 2026

New Study Reveals 75% of Enterprises Report Double-Digit AI Failure Rates as Fragmented Observability Hits Its Breaking Point

March 10, 2026

ADRF Launches Next-Generation PSR NEO Series Public Safety Digital Repeater

March 10, 2026

ColorTokens Introduces Xshield AI Agent to Eliminate Microsegmentation Complexity and Accelerate Breach Readiness

March 10, 2026

Fortinet Advances Its Security Operations Platform with Unified SOC, Agentic AI, and Expanded Endpoint Security

March 10, 2026

Archives

  • March 2026 (31)
  • February 2026 (76)
  • January 2026 (61)
  • December 2025 (45)
  • November 2025 (58)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (91)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2025
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2026 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Fall 2026 | Resilience In Motion

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Fall 2026 | Resilience In Motion. The winner will be announced on July 30. Join us for DRJ's 75th Conference!
    Enter Now