drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Address*
Password*
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Fall 2023
    • DRJ Spring 2024
    • DRJ Spring 2024 – Call for Papers
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • DRJ ACADEMY
    • DRJ Academy
    • Beginner’s Guide to BC
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • Business Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • DE&I
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee
  • Podcast

BCI Emergency Communications Report 2020

by Jon Seals | January 23, 2020 | | 0 comments

Organizations can implement emergency communications plans quicker and more effectively thanks to technological innovation, training and exercising of plans

Caversham, UK – The Business Continuity Institute (BCI), in partnership with F24, has released the 5th edition of the BCI Emergency Communications Report. This annual publication provides insight into how organizations communicate in an emergency, the key communication challenges organizations face and how technology is helping to assist in communications processes.

State of the art technology enables faster communications

This year’s report found an increase in organizations using emergency notification and/or crisis management tools – 67% compared to 59.3% in 2019. This rise in popularity of using specialist emergency notification and crisis management tools/software suggests many of the organizations have decided to switch to specialist tools rather than rely on the free options available in the market. The companies using a software/tool are significantly faster in communications than those without.

The report also found that an increasing number of organizations prefer using software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions rather than on-premise software solutions. Nearly two-thirds of organizations (65.9%) are electing to use a SaaS solution, whilst under a fifth (19.5%) are using on-premise installed software. A SaaS solution can help to deliver a seamless emergency communications solution across multiple devices and can also help surpass the problem of adopting a new solution on legacy systems, an issue highlighted as a barrier to adoption by over half (51.2%) of respondents in the BCI 2019 Disruptive Technologies Report.

Lack of budget is the most cited reason for not employing an emergency communications tool, with over a third (36.4%) reporting they had no budget was defined for emergency communications tools or software. Just under a fifth of respondents (19.1%) felt that their organization was too small for such a tool to be adopted.

In terms of activation timing for emergency communications plans, the report found out that companies are faster than last year: Under a third of respondents confirmed that they can activate their plan within five minutes, compared to a fifth in 2019. Furthermore, a small but significant minority (1.6%) claimed activation took zero time due to an automated response based on an IT event/rule. Only 1% of organizations reported that it took over 12 hours to activate their emergency communications plan, down from 2.4% in 2019.

The human factor in crucial for successful communications

The report also analysed some of the key communication challenges and found that people rather than technology which is the primary challenge for ensuring effective execution of an emergency communication plan. Gathering, validating and sharing accurate information is the greatest challenge to organizations during an emergency response, with communicating with staff at second place.

Human error is also the primary cause for plan failure, with lack of accurate staff information and lack of understanding the top causes for failure. Over half of organizations (54.2%) cite communicating with staff as a key challenge during an emergency. At the same time, however, under two-thirds of organizations (61.7%) seek to ensure that employees’ contact information is kept up to date.

Email remains one of the favoured methods of communication in a crisis situation

In terms of channels, email remains the preferred method of communication for all scenarios, whether internal or external. However, an alternative means of communication should be considered in the case of a network or system outage, particularly as cyber-attacks are a frequent cause for triggering an emergency communications plan.

Other report findings include:
• Higher levels of investments in technology and training means 73.1% of organizations are achieving their expected response levels.
• Nearly half of organizations (41.4%) now have a secure messaging app integrated into their emergency communications plan.
• The number of organizations who have activated their emergency communications plan over the past year has risen marginally to 71.6% (2019: 71 %) and organizations are increasingly using these real-life activations to improve process and procedure.
• Adverse weather/natural disaster and IT/telecoms outage are the most frequent reasons for emergency communications plans being activated in the past year.
• The importance of the external communications/PR department is crucial to the effectiveness of an emergency communications plan, particularly for larger organizations who could see significant customer or share price impact if incorrect or false news is spread.
• IoT devices are currently being used by less than a quarter of organizations, with over a half not having any plans to implement them. However, the number of organizations who are employing IoT technology or plan to do so has risen by 5% this year to 38.3% (2018: 33.0%).
• Despite increased international travel, preparations for staff travelling abroad is surprisingly low: only just over a third (39.7%) have a comprehensive travel risk management plan in place and under half (48.2%) ensure reliable contact information is collected for staff travelling abroad.

Rachael Elliott, Head of Thought Leadership at the BCI, on this year’s report:

“Rarely in our research do we witness such a tangible improvement year-on-year. It is therefore extremely encouraging to see that investment in new technologies coupled with an increased dedication to training and exercising has resulted in improvements in both the effectiveness of response and the time it takes for plans to be activated. Once again, however, it is human failure that is the cause for plans to fail, and we would encourage organizations to continue to ensure that contact details are kept up-to-date and keep up the renewed vigour we are seeing in terms of rehearsing and exercising.”

Christian Götz, Co-founder of F24 AG, Member of the Executive Board and responsible for Sales, Marketing and HR, on this years report:

“I remain convinced that professionals working together with sound, properly implemented technology can handle critical situations far better than without it. I am pleased to see that once again more companies than previously (67%) use a software or tool and thereby are not only significantly faster than those without, but also profit from many additional benefits. The adaption of technology plays a crucial role in order to minimize the consequences of emergency and crisis situations – and this is the overall target we are working on.”

To access the full report (available from Jan 23rd) please visit: https://www.thebci.org/knowledge/search-knowledge.html

Related Content

  1. Disaster Recovery Journal
    The Difference a Hurricane Can Make: The Change of Louisiana’s Emergency Preparedness Effort
  2. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Pandemic Report
  3. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Public and Private Sector Relationships in Emergency Management

Recent Posts

Fortive Schedules Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call

September 29, 2023

Skillsoft Completes Reverse Stock Split

September 29, 2023

The Marketing Alliance Announces Financial Results for Quarter Ended June 30, 2023

September 29, 2023

Oragenics Enters into Agreement with Lantern Bioworks for Replacement-Therapy Assets

September 29, 2023

Simpler Life Emergency Provisions Launches Innovative Emergency Water Product With 100-Year Shelf Life

September 29, 2023

The Crucial Role of a Trustworthy Consultant in Building a Sustainable Program: A CIO Perspective

September 29, 2023

Archives

  • September 2023 (1090)
  • August 2023 (1202)
  • July 2023 (956)
  • June 2023 (1245)
  • May 2023 (1206)
  • April 2023 (1145)
  • March 2023 (1336)
  • February 2023 (1154)
  • January 2023 (1391)
  • December 2022 (1144)
  • November 2022 (1595)
  • October 2022 (1574)
  • September 2022 (1571)
  • August 2022 (1581)
  • July 2022 (1365)
  • June 2022 (1711)
  • May 2022 (1651)
  • April 2022 (1618)
  • March 2022 (1924)
  • February 2022 (1549)
  • January 2022 (1472)
  • December 2021 (1446)
  • November 2021 (1835)
  • October 2021 (1777)
  • September 2021 (1697)
  • August 2021 (1661)
  • July 2021 (1566)
  • June 2021 (1768)
  • May 2021 (1666)
  • April 2021 (1798)
  • March 2021 (1907)
  • February 2021 (1038)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2023
    • Spring 2024

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the industry’s largest resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk management, reaching a global network of more than 138,000 professionals. Offering weekly webinars, the latest industry news, rules and regulations, podcasts, the industry’s only official mentoring program, a quarterly magazine, and two annual live conferences, DRJ is leading the way to keep professionals up-to-date and connected in an ever-changing world.

    LEARN MORE

    TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2023 Disater Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy