drj logo
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Young Professional Spotlight
    • Career Spotlight
    • Article Submission
    • Digital Edition
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Fall 2022
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • DRJ ACADEMY
    • DRJ Academy
    • Beginner’s Guide to BC
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • Business Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • FAQs Committee
      • Web Committee
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee
  • Podcast

Better Prepared for Future Crises: Recommendations from Risk Researchers

by Jon Seals | May 29, 2020 | | 0 comments

Although there were early warnings of an exponentially growing pandemic, most policymakers around the world were unprepared and reluctant to act when Covid-19 first spread from China around the world. Since then the crisis has led to unprecedented restrictions and triggered the worst recession since the Second World War. In an article published in the Journal of Risk Research, Aengus Collins, Marie-Valentine Florin (both EPFL International Risk Governance Center) and IASS Scientific Director Ortwin Renn analyze the key factors and offer recommendations on how we can better prepare for future crises.

The article gives an overview of the spread of Covid-19 and outlines six causes of the crisis: the exponential infection rate, international integration, the insufficient capacity of health care systems in many countries, conflicts of competence and a lack of foresight on the part of many government agencies, the need to grapple with the economic impacts of the shutdown parallel to the health crisis, as well as weaknesses in capital markets resulting from the financial crisis of 2008. The solutions proposed by the team of authors were developed using a framework developed by the International Risk Governance Council to which Ortwin Renn contributed. 

According to the study, five of the aspects of risk governance described in the framework are particularly relevant for efforts to overcome the Corona Crisis. Accordingly, the authors highlight the importance of increasing global capacities for the scientific and technical appraisal of risks in order to provide reliable early warning systems. This research must be supplemented by an analysis of the perceived risk – i.e. individual and public opinion, concerns, and wishes. The awareness of and acknowledgement of these perceptions facilitates effective crisis communication and enables authorities to issue effective public health guidelines. This leads to a key task for decision-makers – risk evaluation: Whether and to what extent are risk reduction measures necessary? What trade-offs are identified during the development of measures and restrictions and how can they be resolved on the basis of recognized ethical criteria in light of the considerable degree of uncertainty? This characterization and evaluation of the risk provides qualified options for risk management. The focus here is on the development of collectively binding decisions on measures to minimize the suffering of affected populations as a whole as well as strategies to minimize undesirable side effects.  Coordinated crisis and risk communication underpinned by robust scientific and professional communications expertise is crucial to the success of efforts to tackle the crisis.  

The team of authors has distilled ten recommendations from its findings:

  1. Address risks at source: in the case of pandemics this means reducing the possibility of viruses being transmitted from animals to humans.
  2. Respond to warnings: This includes the review of national and international risk assessments, and the development of better safeguards for risks with particularly serious impacts.
  3. Acknowledge trade-offs: Measures to reduce a particular risk will impact other risks. Undesirable side effects must be identified in risk assessments. 
  4. Consider the role of technology: How can machine learning and other technologies be applied to support pandemic assessment, preparedness, and responses? 
  5. Invest in resilience: Gains in organizational efficiency have made critical systems such as health care more vulnerable. Their resilience must be strengthened, for example by reducing dependencies on important products and services.
  6. Concentrate on the most important nodes in the system: The early imposition of restrictions on air travel have proved effective in combating a pandemic. A global emergency fund could be established to address the cost of such measures. 
  7. Strengthen links between science and policymaking: Those countries in which scientific information and science-based policy advice are readily available to policymakers have had greater success in combating the coronavirus. 
  8. Build state capacities: Tackling systemic risks should be viewed as an integral aspect of good governance that is performed on a continuing basis rather than as an emergency response.  
  9. Improve communication: Communications around Covid-19 was slow or deficient in a number of countries. One solution would be the establishment of national and international risk information and communication units.
  10. Reflect on social disruption: The Corona Crisis is forcing people and organizations to experiment with new work and life patterns. Now is the time to consider which of these changes should be maintained over the longer term.

Publication:

Aengus Collins, Marie-Valentine Florin & Ortwin Renn (2020) COVID-19 risk governance: drivers, responses and lessons to be learned, Journal of Risk Research, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1760332

Recent Posts

  • Download Your Planning Templates
  • They Called Me ‘The Queen of Doom’
  • Business Continuity as a Business Strategy
  • AlertMedia Improves Emergency Management with the Launch of Event Pages: Connecting People with Critical Information in Real-Time
  • Disaster Recovery Planning in a VM Operating Environment

Recent Comments

  • carybaron@yahoo.com on Contingency Planning Cycle
  • marifergerson0102 on Contingency Planning Cycle

Archives

  • December 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (9)
  • October 2019 (8)
  • September 2019 (8)
  • August 2019 (17)
  • July 2019 (77)
  • June 2019 (92)
  • May 2019 (128)
  • April 2019 (109)
  • March 2019 (80)
  • February 2019 (106)
  • January 2019 (102)
  • December 2018 (96)
  • November 2018 (131)
  • October 2018 (139)
  • September 2018 (81)
  • August 2018 (124)
  • July 2018 (113)
  • June 2018 (90)
  • May 2018 (142)
  • April 2018 (151)
  • March 2018 (124)
  • February 2018 (157)
  • January 2018 (140)
  • December 2017 (118)
  • November 2017 (158)
  • October 2017 (186)
  • September 2017 (139)
  • August 2017 (212)
  • July 2017 (179)
  • June 2017 (214)
  • May 2017 (230)
  • April 2017 (223)
  • March 2017 (159)
  • February 2017 (175)
  • January 2017 (112)
  • December 2016 (8)
  • October 2016 (12)
  • June 2016 (15)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (10)
  • January 2016 (10)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (12)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (15)
  • April 2015 (15)
  • March 2015 (6)
  • February 2015 (7)
  • January 2015 (6)
  • December 2014 (18)
  • November 2014 (19)
  • October 2014 (24)
  • September 2014 (11)
  • August 2014 (13)
  • July 2014 (7)
  • June 2014 (36)
  • May 2014 (19)
  • April 2014 (21)
  • March 2014 (90)
  • February 2014 (5)
  • January 2014 (26)
  • December 2013 (10)
  • November 2013 (25)
  • October 2013 (37)
  • September 2013 (27)
  • August 2013 (8)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • June 2013 (31)
  • May 2013 (17)
  • April 2013 (103)
  • March 2013 (82)
  • February 2013 (120)
  • January 2013 (212)
  • December 2012 (128)
  • November 2012 (92)
  • October 2012 (159)
  • September 2012 (112)
  • August 2012 (153)
  • July 2012 (106)
  • June 2012 (91)
  • May 2012 (35)
  • April 2012 (49)
  • March 2012 (14)
  • February 2012 (19)
  • January 2012 (44)
  • December 2011 (9)
  • November 2011 (21)
  • October 2011 (45)
  • September 2011 (13)
  • August 2011 (9)
  • July 2011 (47)
  • May 2011 (46)
  • April 2011 (10)
  • March 2011 (25)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (17)
  • December 2010 (8)
  • October 2010 (19)
  • September 2010 (1)
  • July 2010 (23)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (1)
  • April 2010 (21)
  • March 2010 (1)
  • February 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (20)
  • November 2009 (4)
  • October 2009 (17)
  • September 2009 (11)
  • August 2009 (2)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (79)
  • April 2009 (20)
  • March 2009 (1)
  • January 2009 (22)
  • November 2008 (1)
  • October 2008 (1)
  • July 2008 (4)
  • June 2008 (22)
  • April 2008 (25)
  • February 2008 (1)
  • January 2008 (16)
  • December 2007 (17)
  • November 2007 (662)
  • October 2007 (410)
  • September 2007 (1)
  • November 1999 (1)

ARTICLES & NEWS

  • Business Continuity
  • Disaster Recovery
  • Crisis Management & Communications
  • Risk Management
  • Article Archives
  • Industry News

THE JOURNAL

  • Digital Edition
  • Young Professionals
  • Career Spotlight
  • Advertising & Media Kit
  • Submit an Article

RESOURCES

  • White Papers
  • Rules & Regulations
  • FAQs
  • Glossary of Terms
  • Industry Groups
  • Business & Resource Directory
  • Business Resilience Decoded

EVENTS

  • Fall 2022
  • Spring 2022

WEBINARS

  • Watch Now
  • Upcoming

CONTACT

  • Article Submission
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us

ABOUT DRJ

Disaster Recovery Journal is the industry’s largest resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk management, reaching a global network of more than 138,000 professionals. Offering weekly webinars, the latest industry news, rules and regulations, podcasts, the industry’s only official mentoring program, a quarterly magazine, and two annual live conferences, DRJ is leading the way to keep professionals up-to-date and connected in an ever-changing world.

LEARN MORE

TWITTER

Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

Follow us for daily updates @drjournal

Newsletter

The Journal, right in your inbox.

Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

Subscribe Now
Copyright 2022 Disater Recovery Journal
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy