drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Fall 2025
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee
  • Podcast

Laminar State of Public Cloud Data Security Report Reveals Growing Breaches, Shadow Data Concerns

by Jon Seals | March 30, 2023 | | 0 comments

The fast pace of cloud transformation and democratization of data has created a new innovation attack surface, leading to 3 in 4 organizations experiencing a cloud data breach in 2022 and the overwhelming majority (68%) of data security professionals naming shadow data as the No. 1 concern of protecting cloud data. The State of Public Cloud Data Security Report 2023, released by Laminar today, reveals that concern over shadow data has increased to a whopping 93% compared to 82 percent the year before. This finding indicates a need for security teams to evolve processes and technologies to autonomously discover, classify, protect, and remediate sensitive cloud data stores, wherever they are located.

Trends Creating A New Threat Vector – The Innovation Attack Surface

Organizations accelerated the pace of transformation during the pandemic. Now they’re staying the course to maintain market competitiveness. In addition, organizations democratized data – making it easy for approved users to access cloud data and create analytics for decision making or operational processes. This trend has introduced new gaps into organizational systems and processes and created the “innovation attack surface” – a new threat vector that most organizations unconsciously have accepted as the cost of doing business.

The innovation attack surface is the continuous, unintentional risk cloud data users, such as data scientists and developers, take when using data to drive innovation. Unlike other attack surfaces determined by external forces such as ransomware, malware or malicious internal actors, the innovation attack surface has resulted from the massive, decentralized unintentional risk created by an organization’s data innovators.

Other trends that have allowed the innovation attack to surface include organizations’ increasing adoption of varied cloud data storage technologies; the proliferation of data (including shadow data) across hybrid, multi-cloud infrastructures; the death of the traditional network perimeter; faster software releases; and the changing role of security. Security teams are charged with protecting data without hindering innovation, but may lack the bandwidth to keep up with cloud service technologies that would improve their ability to execute.

Shadow Data a Growing Concern for 93% of Respondents

While security teams are confident that they have complete visibility into new public cloud data repositories, 93% are concerned about shadow data, up 11% from the year before, and 68% of respondents say it is the greatest challenge in protecting cloud data. Shadow, or unknown, unmanaged data is growing as users now can proliferate data in just a few clicks. Shadow data can occur when copied data lives on in test environments, data gets mis-placed in storage buckets, legacy data isn’t deleted after a cloud migration, data logs become toxic, and orphaned backups are left stale. Laminar Labs has validated this growing concern with our own research that 21% of publicly facing cloud storage buckets have personally identifiable information (PII) exposed and how utilizing versioning in cloud environments can cause shadow data.

Organizational Commitment to Data and Cloud Security Increasing

The good news is that organizations’ commitment to evolving their security programs is growing. Nearly all (92%) of respondents say the uptick in cloud breaches has increased executive and board-level buy-in for best-of-breed security platforms, up from 50% a year earlier. In addition, 66% of organizations have increased security budgets by 41% or more in the past year.

As a result, 97% of security professional respondents report their organization has a dedicated data security team, up from 58% in 2022.

DSPM a New Approach to Securing Data

However, nearly a third (29%) of respondents are only somewhat or not very confident that their existing on-premises security solutions can meet the challenges of improving cloud data security, up from 24% in 2022.

Data security posture management (DSPM) equips security teams with “transformational” capabilities, according to Gartner. DSPM “provides visibility into where sensitive data is, who has access to that data, how it has been used and what the security posture of the data store or application is,” states Gartner. In our survey, 92% of respondents had heard about DSPM and identified 12 different capabilities they’d require from such a solution.

What Security Professionals Seek from Cloud-Native Data Security Solutions

A full 95% of respondents believe that cloud environments are different enough (than on-premises) to require unique security solutions. Given their concerns about on-premises solutions, more security professionals are considering deploying cloud-native security platforms to improve sensitive data protection.

  • 71% said cloud-native security solutions should provide autonomous scanning
  • 63% want to deploy a dynamic, performant platform
  • 54% say such a solution should offer asynchronous operations
  • 53% would like the platform to provide an agentless architecture

A best-of-breed cloud-native security platform should provide autonomous discovery and classification of all data across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Snowflake; inventory data into a single cloud data catalog; and prioritize alerts using an innovative risk-scoring model.

Laminar surveyed more than 500 data security professionals in February 2023. To read the full report, visit: https://laminarsecurity.com/forms/state-of-cloud-data-security-report-2023/

Related Content

  1. The Changing Dynamics of Cloud Object Storage
  2. Data Stored in Cloud-based Applications: The Next Frontier in Data Protection
  3. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Tips to Making the Best Cloud Backup Decision

Recent Posts

CData Featured as a New MCP Launch Partner in Databricks Marketplace, Powering Enterprise AI Agents with Live Access to 350+ Business Systems

November 6, 2025

Has the AI ‘Free Tier’ Era for SMBs Finally Run Out?

November 6, 2025

Keeper Security’s Industry-First Forcefield Protects Against Memory-Based Attacks on Windows Endpoints

November 6, 2025

The AI Paradox: CISOs Gain Confidence in Defense Against Traditional Threats but Are Unprepared for AI Identities, Says Portnox Survey

November 6, 2025

Fortinet Launches Secure AI Data Center Solution to Protect Models, Data, and Infrastructure at Scale

November 5, 2025

Assured Data Protection Launches New US Public Sector Division

November 5, 2025

Archives

  • November 2025 (18)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (91)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2025
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2025 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience. The winner will be announced on December 19. Join us for DRJ's 74th Conference!
    Enter Now