drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Fall 2026 Call for Presentations
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee

Rating Your BC Skills: Little White Lies Can Create Ticking Time Bombs

by Jon Seals | March 19, 2021 | | 0 comments

By MICHAEL HERRERA

Today I want to talk about one of my pet peeves: business continuity staff who exaggerate their abilities on their personal skillset inventories. These little white lies about your BC skills create ticking time bombs for your company’s BCM program.

Related on BCMMETRICS: What It Takes: How to Succeed as a BCM Professional 

How Good Are You?

It isn’t every job that requires people to give themselves a numerical score of their abilities across the key skills of their field. But if you work in a business continuity office, you probably do have such a job.

It’s not fun, but it’s a fact of life in our field.

At MHA Consulting, we often ask the BC staff at our client companies to complete personal inventories evaluating themselves on a scale of 1 to 5 across a range of important BC skills. This would be relevant, for example, if we were engaged to perform a Current State Assessment of the client’s BC program. (The basic idea is widely used throughout BC, though the details vary.)

We typically ask BC staff to evaluate themselves on their knowledge of their company, BCM methodology, and BCM standards. We ask them to rate their ability to perform several core BCM skills, such as performing a Business Impact Analysis, conducting a Threat and Risk Assessment, writing a Crisis Management plan, conducting a CM exercise, writing a Business Recovery plan, and making a presentation to management.

How good do you think are, honestly, on performing all those skills, as measured on a scale of 1 to 5?

That’s what our personal skillset inventory aims to find out.

The Purpose of Personal Inventories

We don’t do this to put anybody on the spot.

When the Air Force conducts an inventory of its aircraft, it doesn’t do it to embarrass the individual planes. It does it to understand its overall capabilities and identify gaps that need plugging.

We ask members of the BCM staff to conduct a personal inventory because their knowledge and ability make up the most important asset of the company’s BCM program. The company needs to know who can do what, and how well, in order to know where its BCM program stands—and how well protected the company is.

This information also helps in guiding the allocation of future resources and in deciding what new people to bring in.

The Temptation to Exaggerate Your BC Skills

The problems start when people actually sit down to complete the inventories—and exaggerate their skills.

They give themselves expert level marks on tasks at which they’re barely competent.

People say, here’s what I did and know how to do. But when they’re put to the test, it emerges there’s a significant gap between what they claim and their ability to execute.

I think in most cases the reason people exaggerate is, they’re afraid to show weakness. Sometimes it might be because they honestly don’t know what constitutes expertise in a given area.

Whatever the reason, they vastly overstate their BC chops on their skillset inventory.

Ticking Time Bombs

The problem with these little white lies about your BC skills is that they can become ticking time bombs for the BCM program.

Every time someone claims to know something they don’t—or to be able do something they can’t—if that false information is baked into the BC program moving forward, it can blow up in everyone’s face at any time.

If someone says they know how to do something, and the program takes them at their word, and then crunch time comes along and they can’t actually do it, the company suffers.

Needless to say, the individual also suffers, in terms of being embarrassed and losing credibility.

The situation is similar to one that mountaineers often encounter. Sometimes snow falls in such a way as to make an area that is full of deep crevasses look like an even plain. Unwary climbers can fall into these gorges when the thin bridge of snow gives way.

A BCM program that is built on inaccurate skillset inventories is a BCM program that is crisscrossed with crevasses hidden by snow.

Don’t Pretend – Improve

How can BCM staff avoid overstating their skills and knowledge on their personal inventories? Simple. Don’t do it! Be truthful. Be honest with yourself and your organization about your BC skills.

You know the old saying: It’s not the crime that gets you, it’s the coverup.

In this case, not knowing something is not close to being a crime. Everyone has gaps in their understanding. Everyone has strengths and weakness. Everyone has things they could stand to learn. There’s nothing wrong with that.

What’s wrong is to claim you can do something that you can’t do, just to save yourself embarrassment. Doing this means you will always be in fear of being found out. And your company will be in a false state of security regarding your ability to perform that function—a situation that might become very embarrassing if and when they ever call you on to deliver the goods.

Here’s a tip: If you’re ever motivated to exaggerate your ability in a certain area, don’t do it; instead, put that skill on your to-do list as an area where you should raise your game. Then raise it.

In short: Don’t pretend. Improve.

It will be better for your organization, better for your BCM office, and better for yourself.

Giving Yourself High Marks, Truthfully

The most valuable asset of any BCM office is the skills and knowledge of its staff. For this reason, team members are sometimes asked to score themselves on their ability to perform key BCM skills. This provides the company with critical information about its BCM program and capabilities.

Unfortunately, sometimes people overstate their knowledge and abilities, giving the company a false idea of its collective skillset. This can cause significant problems down the road. BCM staff should be honest on their personal inventories. Rather than claiming to have skills they don’t, they should work on developing those skills, so that in the future they can give themselves high marks in that area—truthfully. 

This approach to filling out personal inventories is the best one for the individual, for the BCM office, and for the organization.

Further Reading on BCM Skills

For more information on your BC skills, working as a BCM professional and other hot topics in BCM and IT/disaster recovery, check out these recent posts from BCMMETRICS and MHA Consulting:

  • No Respect: The Occasionally Frustrating Truth About Life as a BCM Professional
  • Whitewash: When Clients Try to Get Their BCM Consultants to Conceal Their Problems
  • 8 Oversights That Can Bring Your Operations to a Standstill
  • Help, I Need Somebody: 4 Times When You Should Hire a BC Consultant
  • What It Takes: How to Succeed as a BCM Professional

Michael Herrera is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of BCMMETRICS and its sister company, MHA Consulting. In his role, Michael provides global leadership to the entire set of industry practices and horizontal capabilities within MHA. Under his leadership, MHA has become a leading provider of Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery services to organizations on a global level. He is also the founder of BCMMETRICS, a leading cloud based tool designed to assess business continuity compliance and residual risk. Michael is a well-known and sought after speaker on Business Continuity issues at local and national contingency planner chapter meetings and conferences. Prior to founding MHA, he was a Regional VP for Bank of America, where he was responsible for Business Continuity across the southwest region.

Related Content

  1. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Maintaining Business Continuity During the Coronavirus Outbreak with Mass Notification
  2. Disaster Recovery Journal
    White Papers
  3. How AI Transforms Crisis Management in SEO and Digital Marketing

Recent Posts

Azul 2026 State of Java Survey & Report

February 10, 2026

Backslash Security Raises $19M Series A to Secure Vibe Coding Boom in the Enterprise, Bolsters Board with Cybersecurity Industry Leader

February 10, 2026

Trane Technologies to Acquire LiquidStack to Accelerate End‑to‑End Data Center Thermal Management Solutions

February 10, 2026

OTAVA Becomes New VMware Cloud Service Provider Pinnacle Tier Partner in the Broadcom Advantage Partner Program

February 10, 2026

Gravity Joins Amazon’s Sustainability Exchange

February 10, 2026

Portnox Expands Universal Zero Trust Platform to Protect Mission-Critical Enterprise Applications

February 10, 2026

Archives

  • February 2026 (35)
  • January 2026 (61)
  • December 2025 (45)
  • November 2025 (58)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (91)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2025
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2026 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience. The winner will be announced on February 13. Join us for DRJ's 74th Conference!
    Enter Now