drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
    • Send Your Feedback
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
  • ABOUT
    • Advertise with DRJ
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee
  • Podcast

The Enterprise Trust Gap: Why Companies Fear Losing Control of AI

by Jon Seals | December 1, 2025 | | 0 comments

New research reveals Americans’ biggest AI anxiety is related to regulation and control, mirroring enterprise challenges with shadow AI and governance

A new study tracking public anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI) shows that Americans are more concerned with how to control AI than they are about losing their jobs to it. The joint study by Cybernews and nexos.ai analyzed five categories of AI-related concerns from January to October 2025 and found searches related to governance and privacy far outpaced those about employment.

The findings reveal that “Control and regulation” was the category that evoked the most anxiety, with an average interest score of 27, followed closely by “Data and privacy” at 26. In contrast, “Job displacement and workforce impact” ranked last, despite a year marked by significant tech layoffs.

Žilvinas Girėnas, head of product at nexos.ai, an all-in-one AI platform for enterprises, explains the situation from a management perspective:

“Leaders are not necessarily afraid of AI itself, but rather of losing visibility into its operations. When teams adopt unapproved AI tools, companies lose track of what data is being used and where it’s going. Without visibility, you can’t manage risk or compliance,” he says.

The roots of AI anxiety

The study’s findings highlight a growing global phenomenon known as “AI anxiety.” It describes a collective psychological response to the rapid and pervasive integration of AI technologies into society. It stems from a logical unease about the speed of AI development, its complexity, and the profound societal changes it brings.

A primary source of anxiety is the fear of AI systems evolving beyond human management and understanding. Many advanced AI models operate as “black boxes,” where the reasoning behind their outputs is not transparent. This opacity intensifies fears of losing control and undermines the public’s sense of security, directly explaining why “Control and regulation” is the top concern.

AI systems also rely on vast amounts of personal data, often collected without explicit user consent from sources like social media, browsing history, and smart devices. This continuous data collection, combined with the risk of breaches, fuels fears of identity theft, financial loss, and the erosion of personal privacy, making it a close second in the anxiety rankings.

Furthermore, AI’s ability to create highly realistic but fake content blurs the line between reality and fabrication, leading to mistrust and “reality apathy.” When AI is trained on biased data, it can learn and amplify societal stereotypes in critical areas, such as hiring and lending, causing anxiety about fairness and discrimination.

While job displacement ranked last in average concern, the anxiety associated with it is profound. It’s not just about income. The threat of AI replacing cognitive roles can lead to a diminished sense of purpose, identity, and self-worth, which researchers term “existential anxiety.”

“These public fears are a rational response to the ‘black box’ nature of AI today. Organizations face the same challenge: when teams don’t really understand how AI works, confidence in the technology drops, and it can slow down AI adoption. The only way to innovate safely is to build a framework of trust, and that foundation is built on total visibility into your AI ecosystem,” says Girėnas.

The concrete risks of losing control

For companies, AI anxiety isn’t theoretical. The fear of losing control translates into specific, measurable risks that impact revenue, reputation, and legal standing. McKinsey’s latest research shows that as companies use AI, they are experiencing significant negative consequences:

  • Inaccuracy and reputational damage: Inaccuracy is the single most common negative consequence of AI use reported by companies. When employees use unvetted “shadow AI” tools, the risk of biased or nonsensical “hallucinated” outputs entering products or client communications increases.
  • Cybersecurity vulnerabilities: Over half (51%) of organizations using AI are actively working to mitigate cybersecurity risks, fearing that these tools can be exploited to leak sensitive corporate data or introduce malware.
  • Intellectual property (IP) infringement: Companies are deeply concerned that proprietary code, strategic plans, and trade secrets fed into unapproved public AI models will be absorbed and exposed. Organizations that use AI most heavily, so-called “AI high performers,” are more likely than others to report experiencing IP infringement as a negative consequence.
  • Regulatory compliance failures: Without centralized governance, it is nearly impossible to ensure that AI usage complies with regulations like the GDPR or the EU AI Act. This creates a significant risk of costly fines and legal action, a fear that 43% of organizations are actively trying to mitigate.

How to protect your business

According to Girėnas, solving anxiety around AI requires a proactive and structured approach, and offers four key tips for leaders to close the trust gap and innovate safely:

  1. Centralize governance. Establish a single set of rules governing the company’s use of AI.
  2. Implement a “human-in-the-loop” protocol. Require a person to review and approve the AI’s work before it is used in any critical function.
  3. Make AI governance a C-suite priority. The company’s executives must lead the AI safety and governance efforts.
  4. Shift from restriction to visibility. Focus on identifying which AI tools your teams are using, rather than just trying to ban them.

ABOUT NEXOS.AI

nexos.ai is an all-in-one AI platform to drive secure, organization-wide AI adoption. Through a secure AI Workspace for employees and an AI Gateway for developers, nexos.ai enables companies to replace scattered AI tools with a unified interface that provides built-in guardrails, full visibility, and flexible access controls across all leading AI models — allowing teams to move fast while maintaining security and compliance. Headquartered in Vilnius, Lithuania, nexos.ai is backed by Evantic Capital, Index Ventures, Creandum, Dig Ventures and a number of notable angels including Olivier Pomel (CEO of Datadog), Sebastian Siemiatkowski (CEO of Klarna), through Flat Capital, Ilkka Paananen (CEO of Supercell), and Avishai Abrahami (CEO of Wix.com).

Related Content

  1. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Security Controls, Self-Audit, and Testing
  2. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Comparison of Companies – Contingency Plans Enacted After Hurricane Hugo and Andrew
  3. Disaster Recovery Journal
    Computer Crime: The Undetected Disaster

Recent Posts

Security Navigator 2026: Data Points

December 9, 2025

Assured Data Protection Launches Zerto-Powered Disaster Recovery Service for VMware Environments

December 9, 2025

Mark43 2026 Trends Report Reveals Shift Toward AI With Human Oversight and Clear Opportunities to Modernize Public Safety Tech

December 9, 2025

OTAVA and People Driven Technology Join Forces to Extend Professional Services for Businesses in the Midwest

December 9, 2025

CTERA Ransom Protect Achieves 100% Detection Across Leading Ransomware Families, Stopping Attacks in Seconds

December 9, 2025

RunSafe Security Releases 2025 AI in Embedded Systems Report Offering New Insight Into AI Adoption and Security Gaps

December 9, 2025

Archives

  • December 2025 (26)
  • November 2025 (58)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (91)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2025
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2025 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Spring 2026 | The Future Runs on Resilience. The winner will be announced on December 19. Join us for DRJ's 74th Conference!
    Enter Now