drj logo

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Zip Code*
Please enter a number from 0 to 100.
Strength indicator
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy*
Yes, of course I want to receive emails from DRJ!

Already have an account? Log in

drj logo

Welcome to DRJ

Already registered user? Please login here

Login Form

Register
Forgot password? Click here to reset

Create new account
(it's completely free). Subscribe

x
Skip to content
Disaster Recovery Journal
  • EN ESPAÑOL
  • SIGN IN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • THE JOURNAL
    • Why Subscribe to DRJ
    • Digital Edition
    • Article Submission
    • DRJ Annual Resource Directories
    • Article Archives
    • Career Spotlight
  • EVENTS
    • DRJ Spring 2026
    • DRJ Fall 2026
    • DRJ Scholarship
    • Tracey Rice Memorial Scholarship
    • Other Industry Events
    • Schedule & Archive
  • WEBINARS
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand
    • DRJ Showcase Series
  • MENTOR PROGRAM
  • RESOURCES
    • New to Business Continuity?
    • White Papers
    • DR Rules and Regs
    • Planning Groups
    • DRJ Glossary of Business Continuity Terms
    • Careers
    • The BCI Partnership
  • ABOUT
    • About DRJ
    • 2026 Media Kit
    • Board and Committees
      • Executive Council Members
      • Editorial Advisory Board
      • Career Development Committee
      • DEI
      • Glossary Committee
      • Rules and Regulations Committee

Veeam Research Finds AI’s Promise is Colliding with a Data and AI Trust Gap

by Jon Seals | June 4, 2026 | | 0 comments

New global C-level study finds 48% of executives say trusted, secure data could unlock 25%+ revenue growth yet only 7% of organizations are truly AI-ready

LONDON — Veeam® Software, the Data and AI Trust Company, today unveiled new global research at VeeamON London. The new Data and AI Trust Gap report from Veeam exposes a stark and widening gap at the heart of enterprise AI. While 88% of organizations are already using or piloting AI agents, only 7% qualify as truly AI-ready and 95% say data challenges have already slowed their AI progress. As agentic AI moves from pilots into production, organizations face an urgent challenge: ensuring that the data powering those systems is visible, governed, secure and resilient.

The research, based on a global survey of 600 senior executives across financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, retail, and technology, reveals that AI adoption is scaling dramatically faster than the governance structures designed to manage it. Despite strong executive investment and intent, the ability to control, monitor, and recover from AI failures is critically underdeveloped.

Key findings show AI is scaling faster than control:

  • Only 7% of organizations are truly AI-ready.
  • 88% are already using or piloting AI agents.
  • Only 28% are confident they can detect AI systems operating outside approved parameters.
  • 95% say data challenges have already slowed AI progress.

The figures show a clear trust gap between AI adoption and the governance, visibility, and control required to support it.

“Most organizations don’t have an AI adoption problem; they have an AI trust problem,” said Anand Eswaran, CEO of Veeam. “The first phase of AI was defined by infrastructure investment, experimentation, and acceleration. The next phase will be defined by trust. With the widespread adoption of autonomous AI agents operating at machine speed, the question transitions from whether you can use AI, to whether you can ensure all your data is secure, governed, compliant and resilient. And should something go wrong, can you recover with precision? That’s how you accelerate safe AI at scale without accelerating reputational and operational risk.”

Executive Confidence Masks an Operational Reality Gap

The research uncovers a significant perception gap between the boardroom and the operational teams responsible for delivering AI outcomes. Progress frequently stalls between intent and execution: governance exists inconsistently, data is managed reactively, and ownership is assigned but fragmented.

  • 65% of CEOs believe they have a full AI inventory, compared with just 48% of technical leaders.
  • 52% of CEOs believe they actively lead on data, but only 41% of CISOs and 38% of CIOs agree.
  • 48% of CEOs believe trusted, secure, and compliant data could unlock more than 25% revenue growth.
  • 83% of CEOs feel pressure to accelerate their AI and data capabilities.

This combination of rapid AI adoption, coupled with incomplete visibility and unclear accountability, creates the conditions for failures that are difficult to detect, explain, and contain.

When AI Fails, It Won’t Look Like Downtime

As AI systems become more autonomous, the nature of failure is shifting. Risk is moving away from traditional system outages toward data-level failures that are harder to detect, explain, and contain. The research warns that machine-speed mistakes can outpace detection, forcing resilience to evolve from broad recovery to precision – restoring only what is impacted, rather than rewinding entire environments.

Among organizations running AI today, only a minority could identify within minutes:

  • Which systems it accessed (29%)
  • What actions it took (25%)
  • What decisions it influenced (24%)
  • Which data the system used (22%)

Only 40% of leaders are very confident they can isolate and precisely reverse an agentic AI failure.

Inside-Out, Outside-In: Governance is Converging on Data

The governance challenge is converging on data from two directions: internal demand and external scrutiny.

Inside organizations, unauthorized AI use is now mainstream:

  • 95% report unauthorized AI use within their organization and 93% view it as a significant risk.
  • Yet only 25% offer approved alternatives, meaning most are trying to suppress demand rather than govern it effectively.
  • 44% say increased cyber risk is the top “Shadow AI” risk.

At the same time, regulatory pressure outside the organization is intensifying. 61% of organizations say the EU AI Act has already influenced AI investment strategies in the last 12 months, while 47% cite maintaining audit trails for AI decisions as their biggest compliance concern.

Trust Requires Ownership, Not Shared Ambiguity

The new research shows that the core barriers to progress are fragmented ownership and misaligned operating disciplines – with data, AI, and governance responsibilities often spread across teams in ways that dilute accountability and slow execution. When “everyone owns it,” no one can decisively set policy, enforce controls, or prove outcomes.

Where ownership is clearly defined, outcomes improve significantly:

  • 24% more likely to detect rogue AI behavior in organizations where CISOs own AI agent risk.
  • 47% less likely to detect rogue AI behavior in organizations relying on shared ownership.

Data doesn’t need another champion – it needs accountable leadership strong enough to align governance, security, privacy, compliance, and resilience.

Trust is Becoming the Operating Foundation for Enterprise AI

A clear divide is emerging between organizations that can operationalize trust and those that cannot. Organizations that successfully align ambition, visibility and governance significantly outperform their peers.

Among organizations classified as fully AI-ready, 97% report measurable business benefits from data and AI investments, compared with 48% overall, demonstrating the value of operationalizing trust at enterprise scale.

Veeam: Building the Data and AI Trust Layer

Veeam is addressing this challenge by combining data resilience, security and governance to help organizations see what data AI uses, govern how it’s accessed by humans and agents, and recover clean, trusted data with precision when incidents occur.

“The findings here leave no room for doubt. When 95% of executives say data challenges are already slowing their AI progress, the bottleneck isn’t the model – it’s trusted, governed, recoverable data,” added Eswaran. “Veeam is building the Data and AI Trust layer to give enterprises the visibility, control and precision recovery needed to scale AI safely and deliver real business value.”

About the Research

The research, undertaken between 16 March – 6 April 2026, is based on a global survey of 600 senior executives across industries including financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, retail and technology. Respondents included CEOs, CIOs, CISOs, CDOs and other senior leaders responsible for data, AI, technology and compliance, spanning organizations across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.

Following VeeamON London, the next stop is VeeamON Sydney on 30 July 2026, where regional leaders and customers will come together to explore how to build data resilience and enable trusted, secure AI at scale.

To view the full survey results, visit https://go.veeam.com/data-ai-trust-gap-report. For more information, visit www.veeam.com.

About Veeam Software

Veeam® Software is the Data and AI Trust Company, specializing in helping organizations ensure their data and AI are fully understood, secured, and resilient to enable the acceleration of safe AI at scale. As the market leader in both data resilience and data security posture management, Veeam is built for the convergence of identity, data, security, and AI risk.

Veeam delivers deep contextual intelligence across every data asset, identity, and AI model. The company governs access for both humans and AI agents, automates privacy, compliance, and remediation processes, and protects and recovers organizations from modern threats – including ransomware, disasters, AI errors, and ensuring the restoration of clean, trusted data. Veeam empowers organizations to move beyond simply protecting data, enabling them to activate and unlock its full potential.

Headquartered in Seattle with offices in more than 30 countries, Veeam protects over 550,000 customers worldwide, including 82% of the Fortune 500, who trust Veeam to keep their businesses running.  Learn more at www.veeam.com or follow Veeam on LinkedIn @veeam-software and X @veeam.

Related Content

  1. Burgeoning Unstructured Data Stores Demand Organizations Tackle Data Protection Differently
    Burgeoning Unstructured Data Stores Demand Organizations Tackle Data Protection Differently
  2. Data Stored in Cloud-based Applications: The Next Frontier in Data Protection
  3. Quantifying Cybersecurity Risk in Alumni CRM Systems
    Quantifying Cybersecurity Risk in Alumni CRM Systems

Recent Posts

BeyondTrust Extends Privileged Access Leadership with Release of NHI Governance for Every Non-Human and AI Identity

July 9, 2026

With Launch of CPS Segmentation, Cyolo Offers First Secure Connectivity Platform for Critical Infrastructure

July 9, 2026

Citrix Brings Unified Governance to LLM and Agentic AI traffic with NetScaler MCP Gateway Capabilities

July 9, 2026

Backblaze Publishes Q1 2026 Drive Stats: Reliability Improves as 92% of New Deployments Exceed 20TB

July 9, 2026

Keeper Security Surpasses $225M in ARR with Transformative Growth and is Emerging as the Market Standard for AI-Native Identity Security

July 9, 2026

Rubrik Joins Coalition for Health AI (CHAI) to Advance Responsible AI in HealthShare

July 8, 2026

Archives

  • July 2026 (20)
  • June 2026 (78)
  • May 2026 (67)
  • April 2026 (70)
  • March 2026 (89)
  • February 2026 (76)
  • January 2026 (61)
  • December 2025 (45)
  • November 2025 (58)
  • October 2025 (78)
  • September 2025 (65)
  • August 2025 (59)
  • July 2025 (70)
  • June 2025 (54)
  • May 2025 (59)
  • April 2025 (90)
  • March 2025 (57)
  • February 2025 (47)
  • January 2025 (73)
  • December 2024 (82)
  • November 2024 (41)
  • October 2024 (87)
  • September 2024 (61)
  • August 2024 (65)
  • July 2024 (48)
  • June 2024 (55)
  • May 2024 (70)
  • April 2024 (79)
  • March 2024 (65)
  • February 2024 (73)
  • January 2024 (66)
  • December 2023 (49)
  • November 2023 (80)
  • October 2023 (67)
  • September 2023 (53)
  • August 2023 (72)
  • July 2023 (45)
  • June 2023 (61)
  • May 2023 (50)
  • April 2023 (60)
  • March 2023 (69)
  • February 2023 (54)
  • January 2023 (71)
  • December 2022 (54)
  • November 2022 (59)
  • October 2022 (66)
  • September 2022 (72)
  • August 2022 (65)
  • July 2022 (66)
  • June 2022 (53)
  • May 2022 (55)
  • April 2022 (60)
  • March 2022 (65)
  • February 2022 (50)
  • January 2022 (46)
  • December 2021 (39)
  • November 2021 (38)
  • October 2021 (39)
  • September 2021 (50)
  • August 2021 (77)
  • July 2021 (63)
  • June 2021 (42)
  • May 2021 (43)
  • April 2021 (50)
  • March 2021 (60)
  • February 2021 (16)
  • January 2021 (554)
  • December 2020 (30)
  • November 2020 (35)
  • October 2020 (48)
  • September 2020 (57)
  • August 2020 (52)
  • July 2020 (40)
  • June 2020 (72)
  • May 2020 (46)
  • April 2020 (59)
  • March 2020 (46)
  • February 2020 (28)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (22)
  • November 2019 (11)
  • October 2019 (36)
  • September 2019 (44)
  • August 2019 (77)
  • July 2019 (117)
  • June 2019 (106)
  • May 2019 (49)
  • April 2019 (47)
  • March 2019 (24)
  • February 2019 (37)
  • January 2019 (12)
  • ARTICLES & NEWS

    • Business Continuity
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Crisis Management & Communications
    • Risk Management
    • Article Archives
    • Industry News

    THE JOURNAL

    • Digital Edition
    • Advertising & Media Kit
    • Submit an Article
    • Career Spotlight

    RESOURCES

    • White Papers
    • Rules & Regulations
    • FAQs
    • Glossary of Terms
    • Industry Groups
    • Business & Resource Directory
    • Business Resilience Decoded
    • Careers

    EVENTS

    • Fall 2026
    • Spring 2026

    WEBINARS

    • Watch Now
    • Upcoming

    CONTACT

    • Article Submission
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

    ABOUT DRJ

    Disaster Recovery Journal (DRJ) is the leading resource for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk professionals worldwide. With a global network of more than 138,000 practitioners, DRJ delivers essential insights through two annual conferences, a quarterly digital magazine, weekly webinars, and a rich library of online resources at www.drj.com. Our mission is to empower resilience professionals with the knowledge, tools, and connections they need to protect their organizations in a fast-changing world. Join our community by attending our events, subscribing to our publications, and following us on social media.

    LEARN MORE

    LINKEDIN AND TWITTER

    Disaster Recovery Journal is the leading publication/event covering business continuity/disaster recovery.

    Follow us for daily updates

    LinkedIn

    @drjournal

    Newsletter

    The Journal, right in your inbox.

    Be informed and stay connected by getting the latest in news, events, webinars and whitepapers on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

    Subscribe Now
    Copyright 2026 Disaster Recovery Journal
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Register to win a Free Pass to DRJ Fall 2026 | Resilience In Motion

    Leave your details below for a chance to win a free pass to DRJ Fall 2026 | Resilience In Motion. The winner will be announced on July 30. Join us for DRJ's 75th Conference!
    Enter Now